The federal plan to close as many as
3,600 small, mostly rural post offices is not the right answer to solving the
financial woes of the U.S. Postal Service and I predict this plan will
significantly change in the future and spare the closure of at least some, but
not all, small postal stations.
Here’s why.
America’s rural voices truly will be
heard in Congress and across the nation. The postal policymakers will actually
“listen” this time instead of simply “hearing” -- and will then soon come to publicly admit their current plan does not
fully appreciate or take into account that postal delivery across this nation
is among the most basic fibers of American society – count on it folks. Having
your mail delivered and then looking forward to that almost daily ritual is so ingrained
in the American lifestyle that to take it away from those served by the 3,600
or so postal stations targeted for closure is like saying Americans no longer
can have their apple pie or their favorite ice cream.
This fabric of American culture, as
defined by mail delivery by hand to postal stations large and small, urban and
rural, to post office boxes large and small and to households, has served as a
lifeline for many generations of our citizens. And this friends, is what the
policymakers need to “hear” and what I believe they will indeed hear --- that
will lead to coming up with a different solution – a better, but not perfect
plan.
I would ask policymakers to invite
some key stakeholders to participate in a newly formed and diverse roundtable –
a workgroup if you will – to forge a better postal service management plan. I
will be the first to tell you that such a modified plan will indeed still
involve closure of some small postal stations, just not 3,600 of them. I will
also tell you that it will involve yet another postage fee increase and likely
reduced services to many small and rural postal stations (as in every-other-day
delivery or perhaps even less frequently.) I envision such a plan will still
create heartache and inconvenience for some, but I do believe that a better
plan can be, and should be devised that will afford the opportunity for as many
communities and people as possible to retain their postal lifeline for years to
come.
As a country we can do better. As
policymakers, we can try harder. As a nation, we can preserve a lifeline and a
fabric of our culture. No finger-pointing, no accusations, no negativity – just
allow for the opportunity to devise a better plan for own self-governance and
postal service. Our best in managing postal services is yet to come.