Sending mixed messages to our children. Inadequately identifying a problem. Not trying hard enough. Failing to provide community leadership. Taking the easy way out. Overreacting. Not doing our best. Saying one thing and doing another. Passing another meaningless rule or law simply to satisfy someone’s personal agenda. Not being logical. Failing to do the right thing.
In an American society today, where we supposedly are committed to embracing a diversity of attitudes, beliefs and social mores, we are in some cases doing just the opposite. In a society where we preach that tolerance shall be our guide and that school bullying is unacceptable, some school administrators instead convey just the opposite message. In a society where we are trying to make our schools safer environments for those who learn and teach there, we still have kids bringing guns to school and killing others. And in an American society where we are supposedly embracing “love more; fight less” and learning to adapt to a "gentler, kinder approach to one another” -- comes this new edict from a New Jersey middle school principal: no hugging is permitted among students.
That’s right. According to a recent local television report in the greater New York City metro area, the 900-member student body at New Jersey’s Matawan-Aberdeen Middle School has been told the new rule is no hugging allowed among students. The reason for this community-wide safeguard supposedly results from alleged incidents of inappropriate physical interactions among students.
Really?
And how, might you wonder, are these New Jersey 6th, 7th and 8th grade students ages 11-14 any different from those same kids – your kids or grandkids perhaps – in Ohio, Florida, Arizona, Minnesota or California? A New Jersey middle school student interviewed for the news report was quoted as saying “it makes our school look bad and it makes our school look like we do more than hug, but we do not.”
I believe the student.
According to the news report, the school superintendent said the school district has the responsibility to teach children about appropriate (physical) interactions (in a public place). Isn’t this a parental responsibility? Is this not something our children should learn well before 6th grade? Really? This is acceptable policy? This is how we teach appropriateness -- by enacting a prohibitive rule – reinforcing yet another “negative” in our society, instead of introducing a positive lesson or action item and thus demonstrating some real community leadership?
What message does it send these school children, their parents, their teachers and the rest of the community to also say that students will not be suspended or otherwise disciplined if they go ahead anyway and ignore the rule and continue to share a hug in a classroom or hallway. Does this teach the kids and the community that some people will be held accountable to obey society’s rules, while others will not? Does this teach our children that it’s okay to pick and choose which rules are to be followed, and when and in what manner? Is this how you want your school district to function?
Any of you ever wonder, or sometimes ponder, why society is the way it is today? This no hugging rule story can be found online at
http://usnews.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2012/03/23/10826845-principals-decree-this-is-a-no-hugging-school and is an excellent example why some things are the way they are today. There are so many more examples out there. Where is leadership?